1. The introduction, which warms up the audience, establishes goodwill and rapport with the readers, and announces the general theme or thesis of the argument.
I will start my essay with a description of morning. Through description, I'll express the importance of media and how it strongly affect our daily lives.
2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.
I will explain a current thought of people who think that anonymity on the Internet should be kept. They think that anonymity on the Internet should be guaranteed because it is a way to guarantee the freedom of express and for the press. Then I will state my thought about this argument. I think that anonymity on the Internet should not be kept because for disadvantages if we guarantee anonymity such as suicide of actress and bad internet culture etc.
3. The confirmation, which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.
1_Suicides of actress in 2008 : actress named Choi Jin Sil, a popular actress of Korea, died in her room and it astonished people. The reason she committed suicide was because of malicious comments about her. Through this example, I will emphasize the riskiness of the Internet.
2_Creation of wholesome Internet culture : I found statistics that a lot of people don't care Internet culture. They abuse anonymity in a bad way. As I mentioned in the first reason, bad Internet culture can leads to serious problems.
3_Creation of problems : Anonymity on the Internet could leads to serious problems such as violation of copyright. At this point, I will propose the backgrounds about why the new copyright law was strengthen, and why copyright is important and must be kept.
4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.
I will mainly refute that adverse effects of anonymity are more serious than proper effects it have. For instance, for the first reason, I will argue that the lives of people are more important than freedom of express.
5. The summation, which provides a strong conclusion, amplifying the force of the argument, and showing the readers that this solution is the best at meeting the circumstances.
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기